Features:
✓-Free Parking✓-Restrooms/Porta Potties On-Site✓-Food/Concessions✓-Gift Shop/Souvenirs✓-Optional Games/Midway✓-You will NOT be touched✓-Original Characters✓-Uncovered Outdoor Waiting Line✓-All-Outdoor Attraction
How Do We Get These Scores?
Our Rating System
UPDATE FOR 2022: Our former “Atmosphere” and “Theme” categories have now been combined and renamed “Immersion.” Our intent with this is to give more appropriate credit to attractions that have shown a clear focus on achieving and maintaining better customer experiences (both inside and outside the attractions) and developing creative storylines.
Each of the category scores in this review are calculated using a weighted average of several questions that we rate on a scale of 1 to 10.
The following breakdown explains what these scores typically mean. All of our Teams use this as a reference for providing accurate ratings:
10: “Peak Performance”This score is treated as if it has a chastity belt on it. “10’s” are reserved for the best of the best; those that we feel could not possibly improve on what they’re doing.
9: “Innovative and Groundbreaking”It rocked! Nearly everything seemed to go as planned and it was one of the best we’ve ever seen! These guys are leaders in the industry, and attractions like this are truly hard to come by.
8: “Solid”A high score on our scale. They had a good handle on it and, overall, they knew how to use it well. Most attractions can learn from what these guys are doing.
6 to 7: “Good”We could tell that a good effort was made. However, we’ve seen this done much better at other places, or can detect areas where significant improvements can be made. This is about the top end of what we’d call “Family Friendly.”
5: “Average / Fair”Compared to the competition, they weren’t the best, but definitely not the worst. Scares and Special Effects in this range are usually considered “Family Friendly.”
3 to 4: “Below Average”We could see that a clear attempt was made, but most other professional attractions are doing a much better job at this.
1 to 2: “Poor”It appeared that very little time, thought or effort was contributed to this aspect.
0 (Zero): “Non-Existent”No apparent effort was made to make this a significant contributor to the attraction.
Afterword:This rating system is standardized across all of The Scare Factor’s official haunt review teams. However, keep in mind there will always be minor differences between Teams, as we all have varying levels of experience. Regardless, we do our best to remain true to our core values, which is to promote all haunted attractions!Perhaps the biggest thing to remember is: sometimes the score – in and of itself – doesn’t tell the whole story about an attraction’s merits. This is why we provide detailed explanations for each category… to help you better understand how and why we chose the score/s that we did.We do our best to not let feelings or emotions rule our judgement, while also viewing the attraction through the lens of the typical haunt-goer. But, because all reviews with ratings are inherently subjective, this is nearly impossible to completely prevent. Though, when in doubt, we tend to give slightly lower scores than our original “gut feelings” to account for this, and also give the attraction more room to improve over time.We also do our best to be fair and consistent across all of the haunts that we review. We know that you’ll be looking at these scores and comparing them to other attractions, so we hope this review helps you out in that aspect.Do you have some feedback about our review system? Contact Us Here to let us know what you think!
Hide This
Final Score: 7.88
How Did We Get This Score?
Final Scores:
(15% of Final Score) Cast: 7.57
(15% of Final Score) Costuming: 7.8
(10% of Final Score) Customer Service: 8.74
(10% of Final Score) Atmosphere: 7.83
(15% of Final Score) Special Effects: 6.96
(5% of Final Score) Theme: 7.43
(15% of Final Score) Scare Factor: 7.32
(5% of Final Score) Entertainment & Value: 7.65
Hide This
Summary:
The Haunted Field of Screams is one of Denver’s stalwart haunts, having been in operation for nearly twenty years, and its still bringing the screams to the Northern metro area! Once again, the HFOS brings four separate attractions back to life this fall: CarnEvil, Condemned, Zombie Paintball and the Dead Man’s Maze. Each attraction has a different theme, each of which was executed to varying degrees of success, but all of which are a blast!
Nestled among the ten foot tall corn stalks, the HFOS is in the same location, which is fairly easy to see from the corner of 104th and McKay Road, but be forewarned that Google Maps seems to misdirect visitors on the last turn. Nevertheless, it is fairly simple to locate the large light embankments illuminating the place. In case the quiet, dark drive gets you too relaxed, the bumpy parking lot is sure to wake you up before you hit the gates, which makes sense as it is a part of the field. Once you park and walk through the lighted gateway, you are left to wander through the calming sound of cornstalks swaying in the breeze before encountering the ticket booth, where the creepiness truly begins.
This season, HFOS opened up its midway, expanding a bit to provide a less crowded path from haunt to haunt. Although the extra space was welcome, it also made Zombie Paintball, the farthest attraction from the heart of the event, appear a bit lonely. That expansion, however, was necessary, as the HFOS again features two five-minute escape rooms, haunted midway games, a new tarot card reader’s booth, and seemed to offer a greater food and drink selection, including Blackjack pizza and spirits for those over twenty-one. In any case, the new layout was a nice change that opened up the space nicely.
Cast: 7.57
How Did We Get This Score?
Cast Scores (15% of Final Score):
(20% of Cast Score) Did it seem like there were enough actors?: 7.06
(30% of Cast Score) How creative, believable and convincing were the actors?: 7.31
(20% of Cast Score) How interactive were the actors (verbally and physically)?: 8.13
(15% of Cast Score) How creatively & appropriately did they use dialogue?: 7.81
(15% of Cast Score) Was there a good variety of characters?: 7.81
Hide This
Since the HFOS isn’t a high tech haunt, its greatness comes from its cast, which did a tremendous job! Although the Condemned haunt had a noticeable dearth of death in some spots, the CarnEvil and Dead Man’s Maze cast did a great job working with both the guests and one another to terrify. Both haunts had their moments of utter bedlam, with actors popping out of nooks, crannies, fog and rows of corn with unnaturally good timing, which contrasted well with the quieter moments with nary a chainsaw buzzing in the distance. Unfortunately, that silence seemed to dominate Condemned and parts of Zombie Paintball, both of which would have benefitted from more actors in those dead spaces. Indeed, some parts of Condemned’s path were so calm and quiet that the illusion was broken and we simply enjoyed a peaceful stroll in the moonlight that was quite disappointing. Nevertheless, Condemned also featured one of the best contortionists we’ve had the unsettling pleasure of seeing collapse and reconstitute into a crawling creature before our very eyes! Most of the cast we encountered at Condemned and Zombie Paintball also put on a great performance, even in the face of adolescent bravado.
Costuming: 7.8
How Did We Get This Score?
Costuming Scores (15% of Final Score):
(15% of Costuming Score) How complete / finished did the costumes appear to be?: 7.94
(25% of Costuming Score) How creative / detailed were the costumes?: 7.81
(20% of Costuming Score) Was their makeup creative? Detailed? Realistic?: 7.56
(15% of Costuming Score) How effectively did they use masks (if used)?: 7.75
(25% of Costuming Score) How appropriate were the costumes for their scene/s & theme/s?: 7.94
Hide This
The costumes at the HFOS were well done, appearing authentic to the scenes in which they appeared without being cheesy, looking mass produced or showing low quality. In a surprising change from last year, the CarnEvil clowns could have had a greater variety of costumes, as one can only find the neon clowns that filled the haunt creepy a few times before yearning for more variety. In fairness, they pulled off the blacklight look perfectly well. Condemned also had a couple of costuming misses, but mostly were dead on in quality, fitting the scene and feeding the dread. The same can be said of Zombie Paintball, particularly given the small variety of actors necessary to fulfill the backstory (and the necessary safety gear for the poor souls that reanimate repeatedly in the fields). The Dead Man’s Maze, on the other hand, stood out with respect to its costumes. While there was a somewhat hodgepodge mix of scary characters, they combined nicely into a delicious cocktail of terror.
Customer Service: 8.74
How Did We Get This Score?
Customer Service Scores (10% of Final Score):
(25% of CS Score) How easy was it to locate the attraction, park, and navigate the premises?: 8
(30% of CS Score) How safe was the attraction?: 8
(25% of CS Score) How professional, helpful and friendly were the staff members?: 9.75
(20% of CS Score) How easy was it to find their information before* arrival?: 9.5
Hide This
The customer service at HFOS was again superb! The website cleanly and clearly gave information, and the on site signage was improved in some big ways. Once again, though, the people made all the difference! The staff was extremely helpful and friendly, offering assistance whenever we seemed a bit out of sorts or had a question. Even the midway creepers were happy to pause for a selfie or a scare. While there are some spots in the haunt that are tough to traverse, that difficulty is intentional, as the pathways are clear and nicely flattened for secure footing even in less than ideal weather. The exit trail was markedly less manicured, which, when coupled with the lack of lighting on the path, made it a bit less passable, however. Despite that one rough patch, though, the customer service at the HFOS was exceptional!
Atmosphere: 7.83
How Did We Get This Score?
Atmosphere Scores (10% of Final Score):
(60% of Atmosphere Score) How obvious was it that you were at a haunted house before entering?: 8.13
(40% of Atmosphere Score) How well did the atmosphere prepare you for what you experienced inside?: 7.38
Hide This
The atmosphere at HFOS is a lot of fun, and varied enough to keep it interesting. With the exception of the far side of the haunt grounds near Zombie Paintball, which appears a bit lonesome, the HFOS midway provides just about anything a hauntgoer could want. The haunted carnival games, five-minute escape rooms, creepers, photo ops, and tarot card reader all provide welcome breaks between the four haunts in the scream park, and the souvenir and snack booths allow you to refuel and take a piece of the haunt home with you.
As for the haunts themselves, there were a few missed opportunities, particularly with respect to Condemned and CarnEvil. Condemned’s facade doesn’t do much to support the impression of being haunted, though it does promise the gruesomeness the haunt fulfills. CarnEvil, on the other hand, has a great facade that seemed underutilized. There was an empty balcony, which looked like the perfect spot for a clown to taunt the audience in the line below, and the chance for other kinesthetic elements to set the haunted carnival theme. Zombie Paintball’s haunt facade was fairly unremarkable as well, as it didn’t give much indication of what waited within. On the other hand, that same understated simplicity worked perfectly for Dead Man’s Maze. The haunt facade consists of a ramshackle shack, whose creaky door cracks open just enough for a single beckoning hand to signal the next victims’ entrance.
Special Effects: 6.96
How Did We Get This Score?
Special Effects Scores (15% of Final Score):
(20% of SFX Score) How effective were the sound effects?: 6.06
(20% of SFX Score) How creative / original were the scenes & props?: 6.75
(20% of SFX Score) How well were the scenes detailed?: 6.25
(25% of SFX Score) How well did they achieve & maintain the suspension of disbelief?: 7.94
(15% of SFX Score) How effective were the SFX at providing scares / entertainment?: 7.75
Hide This
Although the HFOS does feature some special effects, the heart of the haunt doesn’t need to be plugged in. Nevertheless, the special effects around were done well! The lighting is once again done extremely well, ranging from either blindingly bright to nearly pitch black to thick with fog, setting up passersby for the next scare. Although the use of some other multimedia elements still existed in parts of each attraction, they were less obvious this year, which lessened their impact. The glowing paintballs, of course, really hit the mark once again! In short, although the HFOS uses special effects, they don’t rely on them to bring the screampark to life!
Theme: 7.43
How Did We Get This Score?
Theme Scores (5% of Final Score):
(30% of Theme Score) Could you tell what the theme was?: 7.13
(50% of Theme Score) How well was the theme carried throughout the attraction/s?: 7.31
(20% of Theme Score) How well does their location authenticate the theme?: 8.19
Hide This
The HFOS has four haunts that each boast a separate theme. CarnEvil and Zombie Paintball are, of course, pretty straightforward and exactly what one would expect. Dead Man’s Maze was also, predictably, an amazing maze filled with all sorts of creatures. Although its theme lacked a bit of clarity or coherence, it coalesces into a great experience. Condemned, on the other hand, didn’t seem to match its purported theme of being hunted down, which sounds great but just wasn’t realized. Though the similarities between each haunt’s flow was similar, causing some muddling of the multiple themes, each of the haunts held their own.
Scare Factor: 7.32
How Did We Get This Score?
Scare Factor Scores (15% of Final Score):
(30% of Scare Factor Score) How scary was it?: 7.13
(15% of Scare Factor Score) How well did they provide scares to the entire group?: 7.69
(25% of Scare Factor Score) How predictable were the scares?: 7.31
(15% of Scare Factor Score) How well did they provide a wide variety of scares?: 7.38
(15% of Scare Factor Score) How strong was the ending / finale?: 7.31
Hide This
The HFOS seems more focused on ensuring that haunt fans have a blast than test their bladders, but all of the haunts deliver some of both! The clowns of CarnEvil, although not the scariest, still sent shivers down our spines with their murderous effusiveness and killer wits. Condemned, on the other hand, brought the fear to fruition in some spots, while others were too calm and solitary to frighten even the most jumpy of guests. Dead Man’s Maze had a great mix of both clever cretins and terrifying fiends, who worked as a well-choreographed team to target groups and individuals that waded through their midsts. Zombie Paintball, in contrast, wasn’t necessarily scary and wasn’t really meant to be so. While there were a few scares, even when you think you’re safe, the thrust of the attraction is more about shooting the undead with acid green ammo, and that’s exactly what it delivers.
Entertainment & Value: 7.65
How Did We Get This Score?
Entertainment & Value Factor Scores (15% of Final Score):
(30% of E&V Score) How satisfied were you with the entertainment received during the main attraction/s?: 8
(25% of E&V Score) How satisfied were you with the entertainment that’s available with* the ticket price, excluding the main attraction/s?: 6
(30% of E&V Score) How appropriate is/are the ticket price/s?: 9
(15% of E&V Score) Have they effectively used their available space?: 7
Hide This
With a general admission price of $44.99, the HFOS is a tremendous value! One would be hard pressed to find another haunted attraction that even approaches the same quality of HFOS for less than $12 per attraction, but for that low cost, the HFOS treats guests to four fun frightening features, complete with a midway that is itself packed with creepers, games and other fun stuff, and all surrounded by ten-foot-tall corn stalks.
Make sure to add a trip to the hallowed grounds of HFOS this fall, and don’t forget to plan for next season while you’re at it!
How Did We Get These Scores
Our Rating System
Each of the category scores in this review are calculated using a weighted average of several questions that we rate on a scale of 1 to 10.
The following breakdown explains what these scores typically mean. All of our Teams use this as a reference for providing accurate ratings:
10: “Peak Performance”This score is treated as if it has a chastity belt on it. “10’s” are reserved for the best of the best; those that we feel could not possibly improve on what they’re doing.
9: “Innovative and Groundbreaking”It rocked! Nearly everything seemed to go as planned and it was one of the best we’ve ever seen! These guys are leaders in the industry, and attractions like this are truly hard to come by.
8: “Solid”A high score on our scale. They had a good handle on it and, overall, they knew how to use it well. Most attractions can learn from what these guys are doing.
6 to 7: “Good”We could tell that a good effort was made. However, we’ve seen this done much better at other places, or can detect areas where significant improvements can be made. This is about the top end of what we’d call “Family Friendly.”
5: “Average / Fair”Compared to the competition, they weren’t the best, but definitely not the worst. Scares and Special Effects in this range are usually considered “Family Friendly.”
3 to 4: “Below Average”We could see that a clear attempt was made, but most other professional attractions are doing a much better job at this.
1 to 2: “Poor”It appeared that very little time, thought or effort was contributed to this aspect.
0 (Zero): “Non-Existent”No apparent effort was made to make this a significant contributor to the attraction.
Afterword:This rating system is standardized across all of The Scare Factor’s official haunt review teams. However, keep in mind there will always be minor differences between Teams, as we all have varying levels of experience. Regardless, we do our best to remain true to our core values, which is to promote all haunted attractions!Perhaps the biggest thing to remember is: sometimes the score – in and of itself – doesn’t tell the whole story about an attraction’s merits. This is why we provide detailed explanations for each category… to help you better understand how and why we chose the score/s that we did.We do our best to not let feelings or emotions rule our judgement, while also viewing the attraction through the lens of the typical haunt-goer. But, because all reviews with ratings are inherently subjective, this is nearly impossible to completely prevent. Though, when in doubt, we tend to give slightly lower scores than our original “gut feelings” to account for this, and also give the attraction more room to improve over time.We also do our best to be fair and consistent across all of the haunts that we review. We know that you’ll be looking at these scores and comparing them to other attractions, so we hope this review helps you out in that aspect.Do you have some feedback about our review system? Contact Us Here to let us know what you think!
Hide This