Features:
✓-Paid Parking✓-Restrooms/Porta Potties On-Site✓-Food/Concessions✓-“Old-School” (Low Tech)✓-You may be touched✓-You will NOT be touched✓-Original Characters✓-Uncovered Outdoor Waiting Line
How Do We Get These Scores?
Our Rating System
UPDATE FOR 2022: Our former “Atmosphere” and “Theme” categories have now been combined and renamed “Immersion.” Our intent with this is to give more appropriate credit to attractions that have shown a clear focus on achieving and maintaining better customer experiences (both inside and outside the attractions) and developing creative storylines.
Each of the category scores in this review are calculated using a weighted average of several questions that we rate on a scale of 1 to 10.
The following breakdown explains what these scores typically mean. All of our Teams use this as a reference for providing accurate ratings:
10: “Peak Performance”This score is treated as if it has a chastity belt on it. “10’s” are reserved for the best of the best; those that we feel could not possibly improve on what they’re doing.
9: “Innovative and Groundbreaking”It rocked! Nearly everything seemed to go as planned and it was one of the best we’ve ever seen! These guys are leaders in the industry, and attractions like this are truly hard to come by.
8: “Solid”A high score on our scale. They had a good handle on it and, overall, they knew how to use it well. Most attractions can learn from what these guys are doing.
6 to 7: “Good”We could tell that a good effort was made. However, we’ve seen this done much better at other places, or can detect areas where significant improvements can be made. This is about the top end of what we’d call “Family Friendly.”
5: “Average / Fair”Compared to the competition, they weren’t the best, but definitely not the worst. Scares and Special Effects in this range are usually considered “Family Friendly.”
3 to 4: “Below Average”We could see that a clear attempt was made, but most other professional attractions are doing a much better job at this.
1 to 2: “Poor”It appeared that very little time, thought or effort was contributed to this aspect.
0 (Zero): “Non-Existent”No apparent effort was made to make this a significant contributor to the attraction.
Afterword:This rating system is standardized across all of The Scare Factor’s official haunt review teams. However, keep in mind there will always be minor differences between Teams, as we all have varying levels of experience. Regardless, we do our best to remain true to our core values, which is to promote all haunted attractions!Perhaps the biggest thing to remember is: sometimes the score – in and of itself – doesn’t tell the whole story about an attraction’s merits. This is why we provide detailed explanations for each category… to help you better understand how and why we chose the score/s that we did.We do our best to not let feelings or emotions rule our judgement, while also viewing the attraction through the lens of the typical haunt-goer. But, because all reviews with ratings are inherently subjective, this is nearly impossible to completely prevent. Though, when in doubt, we tend to give slightly lower scores than our original “gut feelings” to account for this, and also give the attraction more room to improve over time.We also do our best to be fair and consistent across all of the haunts that we review. We know that you’ll be looking at these scores and comparing them to other attractions, so we hope this review helps you out in that aspect.Do you have some feedback about our review system? Contact Us Here to let us know what you think!
Hide This
Final Score: 8.59
How Did We Get This Score?
Final Scores:
(15% of Final Score) Cast: 8.28
(15% of Final Score) Costuming: 8.23
(10% of Final Score) Customer Service: 9.75
(10% of Final Score) Atmosphere: 9.12
(15% of Final Score) Special Effects: 8.59
(5% of Final Score) Theme: 8.97
(15% of Final Score) Scare Factor: 8.33
(5% of Final Score) Entertainment & Value: 8.25
Hide This
Summary:
Rising from the swamps outside of Nakina, NC, we found a huge circus tent populated with a bevy of rather sinister-looking clowns. This enticing spectacle, accompanied by blaring music and blasts of fire from another performer, was all just a ruse to entice us into the haunt known as Panic Attack! This sprawling haunt contains insanely decorated sets packed full of detail ‘ enough eye-candy to keep the unsuspecting distracted long enough for just about anything to sneak up on them in the dark. We have previously attended Panic Attack and were excited to return to this exquisitely detailed haunted attraction.
This haunt is one of the premier professional haunts in this part of North Carolina – from movie quality sets to highly detailed costumes, Panic Attack is ready to bring the scares to guests.
Cast: 8.28
How Did We Get This Score?
Cast Scores (15% of Final Score):
(20% of Cast Score) Did it seem like there were enough actors?: 8.6
(30% of Cast Score) How creative, believable and convincing were the actors?: 8.3
(20% of Cast Score) How interactive were the actors (verbally and physically)?: 8.1
(15% of Cast Score) How creatively & appropriately did they use dialogue?: 8
(15% of Cast Score) Was there a good variety of characters?: 8.3
Hide This
Panic Attack boasts a wide variety of costumed creeps and creatures. Although we initially witnessed a big top show populated with weapon-wielding clowns, soon we delved through a (not so) abandoned fishing village and the buildings beyond that harvested life from the water. Many of the creatures beyond seemed interested in likewise parting us from our own lives or souls or blood or human forms. Pirates were seeking to get us to add coins to their hoard, as well as undead pirates seeking to add us to their horde. We also beheld a sinister section of a crashed spacecraft where aliens sought to separate us from the earth. By the end, there was even a colossal factory with workers attempting to turn us, or perhaps our corpses, into clowns as well, which brought everything full circle.
Costuming: 8.23
How Did We Get This Score?
Costuming Scores (15% of Final Score):
(15% of Costuming Score) How complete / finished did the costumes appear to be?: 8.1
(25% of Costuming Score) How creative / detailed were the costumes?: 8.2
(20% of Costuming Score) Was their makeup creative? Detailed? Realistic?: 8
(15% of Costuming Score) How effectively did they use masks (if used)?: 7.9
(25% of Costuming Score) How appropriate were the costumes for their scene/s & theme/s?: 8.7
Hide This
No monster, be they insane killer clown, menacing pirate, or undead soul-sucking vampire, would be complete without costuming and make-up and masks. This is true, too, at Panic Attack. The various characters are all identifiable and fit their respective scenes. Masks and make-up often add to the eye candy of the elaborate sets, making the whole area come alive. We especially loved seeing the captive mermaid. This character is very believable and integrated well into her scene. A trio of religious figures ‘ a priest of Baphomet, the old witch, and the voodoo priestess, each of whom was foretelling our doom ‘ were also well done.
After passing the big top of the queue area, the entire trail is unified by a similar presentation of make-up and costuming. The layers of distressing, be they dirt and grime or blood and effluent, are all done in a fashion that is an almost unique Panic Attack signature style.
Customer Service: 9.75
How Did We Get This Score?
Customer Service Scores (10% of Final Score):
(25% of CS Score) How easy was it to locate the attraction, park, and navigate the premises?: 9
(30% of CS Score) How safe was the attraction?: 10
(25% of CS Score) How professional, helpful and friendly were the staff members?: 10
(20% of CS Score) How easy was it to find their information before* arrival?: 10
Hide This
Easy enough to find with GPS ‘ or the long line of cars snaking out to the road ‘ Panic Attack’s parking attendants are sufficient to guide plenty of vehicles around the large field. There is plenty of non-costumed staff who are happy to help guests, answer questions, and keep the lines moving throughout the night.
Panic Attack maintains an online presence that is just as detailed as their elaborate sets. Be sure to check out their various platforms to keep abreast of different special appearances from celebrity guests or other performers. Guests can also purchase tickets online before arrival to speed up their night of fright.
The trail is easy to navigate with the current setup. Ramps often traverse entrances to various scenes, and care has been taken to ensure smooth transitions.
Atmosphere: 9.12
How Did We Get This Score?
Atmosphere Scores (10% of Final Score):
(60% of Atmosphere Score) How obvious was it that you were at a haunted house before entering?: 9
(40% of Atmosphere Score) How well did the atmosphere prepare you for what you experienced inside?: 9.3
Hide This
The vast, big-top set that has flowed into the parking lot, coupled with the killer clowns that roam from the long dirt driveway, through the parking area, and all through the queue area, set the stage for a night of surprises and frights. Bright lights scratched through the sky like the roaring chainsaw carried by a clown, while other clowns blasted party music over the crowd like the flames spit out into the air by another.
Before the ticket booth, there was also an exotic animal show (accepting donations) that had a variety of animals on hand that elicited more than a few nervous looks from passersby.
Special Effects: 8.59
How Did We Get This Score?
Special Effects Scores (15% of Final Score):
(20% of SFX Score) How effective were the sound effects?: 8.2
(20% of SFX Score) How creative / original were the scenes & props?: 9
(20% of SFX Score) How well were the scenes detailed?: 9
(25% of SFX Score) How well did they achieve & maintain the suspension of disbelief?: 8
(15% of SFX Score) How effective were the SFX at providing scares / entertainment?: 9
Hide This
Panic Attack always delivers on highly detailed sets and larger-than-life props, and this year was no different. Almost every inch of this haunt is elaborately detailed, not just the walls but also floors and ceilings. In addition, the trail we traversed doubles back on itself several times, adding a sense of confusion and disorientation while also giving tiny glimpses of towering sets that seem to be just around the corner.
The winding trail through Panic Attack also plays with the senses by providing a distinct change in lighting and sound when moving from scene to scene. Sometimes it’s a subtle shift with a wall blanketing and damping the sound of the previous area while allowing the understated music of the next to start to build. At other times, it’s a sudden crescendo of noise and light that overwhelmed us.
Sometimes the effects aren’t just huge, lunging props or surrounding sets filled with detail, but just the brief and tricky use of lighting to emphasize a sense of dread, to spotlight an actor’s highly detailed costume, or to hide a darkened alcove.
Theme: 8.97
How Did We Get This Score?
Theme Scores (5% of Final Score):
(30% of Theme Score) Could you tell what the theme was?: 8.9
(50% of Theme Score) How well was the theme carried throughout the attraction/s?: 8.6
(20% of Theme Score) How well does their location authenticate the theme?: 10
Hide This
On top of Panic Attack’s usual aquatic theme ‘ from pirates to creatures of the deep ‘ this year, there was an added layer. Killer clowns, perhaps warped by something not of this world, have taken over the haunted site. PA did this very well by bookending the site with their clowns. The ones out front tended to look fresh and clean, while the last section of the haunt (the Clown Factory) looked suitably filthy, unkempt, and bloodied from the massacre of those who had fallen prey to the clowns before our arrival. The crew at PA do an admirable job of creating a unifying theme and pushing it throughout the haunt, tying together some disparate elements with a singular style of d������cor and costuming.
Scare Factor: 8.33
How Did We Get This Score?
Scare Factor Scores (15% of Final Score):
(30% of Scare Factor Score) How scary was it?: 8.4
(15% of Scare Factor Score) How well did they provide scares to the entire group?: 8.1
(25% of Scare Factor Score) How predictable were the scares?: 8.6
(15% of Scare Factor Score) How well did they provide a wide variety of scares?: 8
(15% of Scare Factor Score) How strong was the ending / finale?: 8.3
Hide This
Distractions and jump scares are the mainstays of fear at Panic Attack. There are a few looming glares or sinister implications recited by one imposing figure or another, but most of the scares we experienced were of the quick and sudden variety. However, not even our experienced eyes could catch every hidden spot or darkened alcove before something was popping out with a roar, a scream, or a shriek. The roar of chainsaws echoes overhead and provided building anticipation the closer we came to the end of the trail. We were always ready to see a chainsaw-wielding figure pop out around the next corner, and by the end, we were not disappointed.
Entertainment & Value: 8.25
How Did We Get This Score?
Entertainment & Value Factor Scores (15% of Final Score):
(30% of E&V Score) How satisfied were you with the entertainment received during the main attraction/s?: 8
(25% of E&V Score) How satisfied were you with the entertainment that’s available with* the ticket price, excluding the main attraction/s?: 8.4
(30% of E&V Score) How appropriate is/are the ticket price/s?: 8
(15% of E&V Score) Have they effectively used their available space?: 9
Hide This
Parking at Panic Attack is $5 per vehicle; carpooling with a big crowd is an excellent idea for a visit. We traversed the trail in 30 minutes; for the elaborate sets and pre-show entertainment, that’s a great length delivered for the price of a $30 admission ticket. If you don’t want to wait, there are also options for a Fast Pass to skip the general admission line while still having some time to experience the clown’s big top. The VIP ticket gets guests to the front of even that, allowing visitors to enter the haunt immediately. Given the crowds that we saw building during our visit, we can undoubtedly advise future visitors to judge the size of the queue-line when they arrive to consider one of these upgrades. Even without the fast pass option, the music and sideshow-like elements of the big top that looms over the waiting area give visitors something to enjoy.
How Did We Get These Scores
Our Rating System
Each of the category scores in this review are calculated using a weighted average of several questions that we rate on a scale of 1 to 10.
The following breakdown explains what these scores typically mean. All of our Teams use this as a reference for providing accurate ratings:
10: “Peak Performance”This score is treated as if it has a chastity belt on it. “10’s” are reserved for the best of the best; those that we feel could not possibly improve on what they’re doing.
9: “Innovative and Groundbreaking”It rocked! Nearly everything seemed to go as planned and it was one of the best we’ve ever seen! These guys are leaders in the industry, and attractions like this are truly hard to come by.
8: “Solid”A high score on our scale. They had a good handle on it and, overall, they knew how to use it well. Most attractions can learn from what these guys are doing.
6 to 7: “Good”We could tell that a good effort was made. However, we’ve seen this done much better at other places, or can detect areas where significant improvements can be made. This is about the top end of what we’d call “Family Friendly.”
5: “Average / Fair”Compared to the competition, they weren’t the best, but definitely not the worst. Scares and Special Effects in this range are usually considered “Family Friendly.”
3 to 4: “Below Average”We could see that a clear attempt was made, but most other professional attractions are doing a much better job at this.
1 to 2: “Poor”It appeared that very little time, thought or effort was contributed to this aspect.
0 (Zero): “Non-Existent”No apparent effort was made to make this a significant contributor to the attraction.
Afterword:This rating system is standardized across all of The Scare Factor’s official haunt review teams. However, keep in mind there will always be minor differences between Teams, as we all have varying levels of experience. Regardless, we do our best to remain true to our core values, which is to promote all haunted attractions!Perhaps the biggest thing to remember is: sometimes the score – in and of itself – doesn’t tell the whole story about an attraction’s merits. This is why we provide detailed explanations for each category… to help you better understand how and why we chose the score/s that we did.We do our best to not let feelings or emotions rule our judgement, while also viewing the attraction through the lens of the typical haunt-goer. But, because all reviews with ratings are inherently subjective, this is nearly impossible to completely prevent. Though, when in doubt, we tend to give slightly lower scores than our original “gut feelings” to account for this, and also give the attraction more room to improve over time.We also do our best to be fair and consistent across all of the haunts that we review. We know that you’ll be looking at these scores and comparing them to other attractions, so we hope this review helps you out in that aspect.Do you have some feedback about our review system? Contact Us Here to let us know what you think!
Hide This
Awards:
2019
Most Enthusiastic Chainsaw Attacker